In the early days of cryptocurrency, the involvement of venture capital (VC) funds in a project was considered a hallmark of legitimacy. Retail investors often viewed VC backing as a sign that a project had a strong foundation and bright prospects. However, this perception has shifted in recent years, with retail investors becoming more skeptical of VC-funded crypto projects. Despite the influx of large capital into projects, token prices often decline, leaving many retail investors disillusioned. As a result, the term "VC coins" has taken on a somewhat ironic connotation in the crypto community.

In this blog, we’ll explore how VC firms profit from early-stage crypto investments, the impact of Fully Diluted Valuations (FDV), and how retail investors can use insights from VCs to better navigate the volatile world of crypto investments.

VC Investment in Crypto: From Trust to Skepticism

When venture capitalists first entered the crypto space, their involvement was often viewed as a vote of confidence in the projects they backed. After all, VCs bring more than just money to the table—they often provide strategic advice, industry connections, and a wealth of business experience that startups might otherwise lack. For many investors, VC funding was a sign that a project had passed a rigorous due diligence process, increasing its chances of success.

However, over time, this perception has changed. Retail investors have grown increasingly skeptical of projects backed by VCs. The root of this skepticism lies in the fact that even though many projects receive significant funding from prominent VC firms, their token prices frequently fall after launch, leaving retail investors disappointed. As a result, the term "VC coins" has emerged, often used sarcastically to describe projects that seem to exist primarily for the benefit of early investors and VCs, rather than the broader community.

Why Are Investors Losing Faith in VC-Backed Projects?

One of the key reasons retail investors have become disillusioned with VC-backed crypto projects is the misalignment of incentives between VCs and retail investors. VCs typically invest in projects at an early stage, often purchasing tokens at a much lower price than the general public. This gives them a significant advantage, as they can sell their tokens once the project launches, often at a substantial profit.

For retail investors, this dynamic can be frustrating. While they might buy into a project with high hopes, they often find themselves holding tokens that quickly lose value as early investors cash out. The disconnect between the high valuations placed on these projects by VCs and their subsequent performance in the open market has led to widespread skepticism.

How VCs Profit from Early-Stage Crypto Projects

To understand the growing skepticism surrounding VC-backed crypto projects, it’s important to understand how venture capital firms make money from their investments. Unlike retail investors, who typically buy tokens on public exchanges, VCs have the advantage of entering projects during the early stages, before tokens are even listed. This allows them to buy tokens at a fraction of the price that retail investors will eventually pay.

Here’s a breakdown of how VCs profit from crypto projects:

1. Early Access to Tokens at Low Prices

VCs typically invest in a project during its seed or private sale rounds, giving them access to tokens at a discounted price. These early-stage investments are often structured with significant bonuses or lockup periods, allowing VCs to buy large quantities of tokens at a fraction of the price the general public will eventually pay. This early entry gives VCs a significant advantage, as they can potentially sell these tokens at a much higher price once the project launches.

2. Exiting Before Token Unlocks

In many cases, VCs look to exit their positions before the full supply of tokens is unlocked. This creates a situation where the Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV) of a project is extremely high, but the actual circulating supply of tokens is relatively low. Once tokens begin to unlock, there is often a sell-off as early investors and VCs look to cash in their profits, driving down the price of the token.

For retail investors, this often means entering a project at a time when there is immense selling pressure, leading to a sharp decline in price. The large discrepancy between FDV and circulating supply can create an unsustainable market, where the token's price is quickly eroded by the constant selling pressure.

3. Profiting Beyond Token Price: Management and Performance Fees

It’s also important to note that VC firms don’t solely rely on token price appreciation to make money. They often charge management fees and performance fees to their limited partners (LPs), ensuring that they earn a return even if the token’s price doesn’t increase significantly. This gives VCs multiple revenue streams, further separating their interests from those of retail investors.

In short, VC firms have the ability to de-risk their investments by selling tokens early, while retail investors are often left holding the bag. This dynamic has led to a growing sense of frustration among retail investors, who feel that their interests are not aligned with those of the venture capitalists backing these projects.

The Impact of Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV) and Token Unlocks

One of the most significant issues with VC-backed projects is the disconnect between the Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV) of a project and its actual market value. FDV represents the market capitalization of a project if all of its tokens were in circulation. However, in many cases, only a small portion of a project’s tokens are actually available for trading. This creates a situation where the market cap appears inflated, but the circulating supply is much smaller.

As a result, when tokens begin to unlock and more of the supply enters the market, the selling pressure increases dramatically. This often leads to a sharp drop in token prices, as early investors look to cash out at the earliest opportunity. Retail investors, who may have bought in at a higher price, are left to bear the brunt of this selling pressure.

The issue of FDV is particularly problematic for retail investors, as it creates a false sense of value. Many retail investors look at the market cap of a project and assume that the token is fairly valued. However, they often fail to consider the impact of future token unlocks, which can flood the market with additional supply and drive down the price.

Investing in Companies, Not Just Tokens: The Uniswap Example

Another key factor that complicates the relationship between VCs and retail investors is the fact that VCs are often investing in the company, not just the token. For example, projects like Uniswap generate revenue through transaction fees rather than relying solely on the price of their native token, UNI. This means that VCs can still profit from the success of the project, even if the token’s price does not appreciate.

For retail investors, this creates a disconnect. Many retail investors buy into a project with the expectation that the price of the token will increase. However, for VCs, the success of the project can be measured in other ways, such as the revenue it generates or its growth in users. This misalignment of expectations can lead to disappointment for retail investors, who may have bought tokens with the hope of seeing immediate price appreciation.

Understanding VC Investment Strategies: Avoiding Blind Investments

One of the key lessons for retail investors is the importance of understanding the investment strategies employed by VCs. Not all VCs invest in the same way, and it’s crucial for retail investors to recognize the different approaches these funds take.

Focused Investments vs. Broad Allocation

Some VC firms specialize in specific sectors of the crypto space, such as NFTs, gaming, or DeFi. These funds often have deep expertise in their chosen area, and their involvement can be a positive signal for investors interested in that particular niche. Other VC firms take a more broad-based approach, spreading their investments across a wide range of projects. For retail investors, it’s important to understand the focus and strategy of the VC firms backing a project, as this can provide insight into the fund’s level of commitment and expertise.

Long-Term vs. Short-Term Profit

Retail investors should also consider the time horizon of VC investments. Some funds are focused on long-term growth and are willing to hold their investments for several years, while others may be looking for quick profits. Understanding the exit strategy of the VC firms involved in a project can help retail investors set realistic expectations for the token’s price performance.

VC Backing Is Not a Guarantee of Success

While the involvement of a prominent VC firm can be a positive signal, it’s no longer the “holy grail” that it once was. Many projects backed by VCs have failed to live up to their potential, and retail investors can no longer rely solely on VC involvement as a marker of quality. However, it’s important to recognize that VCs still provide several key benefits to the projects they back.

The Value VCs Bring Beyond Capital

Venture capitalists bring more than just money to the table. They offer industry expertise, strategic guidance, connections to other players in the crypto space, and access to resources that startups might not otherwise have. These factors can significantly improve the chances of a project’s success, even if the token price doesn’t immediately reflect that success.

Moreover, well-established VC firms still carry a certain level of prestige. A project backed by a top-tier VC fund is more likely to attract attention from other investors, developers, and industry insiders. This can help the project build credibility and attract a stronger community, even if the token price fluctuates in the short term.

How to Use VC Insights to Inform Your Investment Strategy

For retail investors, the key is to approach VC-backed projects with a healthy dose of skepticism and due diligence. Instead of assuming that a project backed by a prominent VC firm is a surefire success, retail investors should look deeper into the project’s fundamentals, including its team, technology, market fit, and tokenomics.

One useful strategy is to use VC involvement as a filter. Projects backed by well-known VCs are likely to have passed a certain level of scrutiny, but that doesn’t mean they’re guaranteed to succeed. Retail investors should take the time to understand the break-even points for VC investments, as this can provide insight into potential selling pressure.

Additionally, retail investors can benefit from following VC reporting and portfolio updates. VCs often publish reports on their investment strategies and the projects they back, offering valuable insights into emerging trends and promising technologies. By staying informed about the investment decisions of top VC firms, retail investors can gain a clearer understanding of the long-term potential of certain projects.

Conclusion: VC Investments and the Retail Investor’s Perspective

In the world of crypto, venture capital funding is no longer the guarantee of success it once was. While VCs bring valuable resources and expertise to the projects they back, their interests don’t always align with those of retail investors. The rise of “VC coins” has led to growing skepticism, as retail investors increasingly recognize the potential pitfalls of investing in projects where early backers have already locked in profits.

That being said, VC involvement can still be a positive signal, especially for projects with strong fundamentals and long-term potential. By understanding the investment strategies employed by VCs and keeping a close eye on the break-even points for early investors, retail investors can better navigate the complex world of crypto investments.

Ultimately, the key for retail investors is to approach each investment with caution, research, and a clear understanding of the dynamics at play. By leveraging insights from VC reports and understanding the tokenomics of a project, retail investors can make more informed decisions and avoid the pitfalls of blind speculation.

‍