Forbes recently released a list of 20 blockchains dubbed "Zombie Chains." These blockchains have large market capitalizations but lack real-world utility. They are mostly sustained by speculation with minimal activity from their communities or development teams. While these projects were once highly anticipated, they have gradually faded into obscurity or failed to meet their initial expectations.]

XRP (XRP)

Expectation: Originally seen as a potential replacement for the SWIFT banking system, XRP has yet to fulfill this role and is now facing competition from Ripple's own stablecoin.
Reality: Despite its high valuation, XRP still lacks significant real-world adoption in the payment industry. Its speculative value remains high, but it has failed to provide meaningful utility.
Trust-building Insight: XRP’s ongoing legal battles with the SEC have made many investors cautious, and its promised breakthrough in banking has not materialized.

Cardano (ADA)

Expectation: Launched in 2017 to compete with Ethereum, Cardano was designed to bring advanced smart contracts and decentralized applications (dApps) to the market.
Reality: Cardano has struggled to find significant real-world use cases despite its early promises. Its slow development and lack of clear applications have caused many to question its viability.
Trust-building Insight: Cardano's emphasis on peer-reviewed research and a slow, deliberate approach to development has garnered trust in some academic and research circles, but its real-world impact remains minimal.

Bitcoin Cash (BCH)

Expectation: Forked from Bitcoin in 2017, Bitcoin Cash aimed to offer faster, more scalable transactions than Bitcoin.
Reality: BCH has failed to differentiate itself meaningfully from Bitcoin, and its adoption has stagnated. It remains largely overshadowed by the original Bitcoin.
Trust-building Insight: While BCH maintains a small community of loyal supporters, its broader market relevance has waned.

Litecoin (LTC)

Expectation: Once hailed as the "silver to Bitcoin’s gold," Litecoin was designed to be a faster, more efficient version of Bitcoin.
Reality: Litecoin has seen its usage decline as newer, more advanced cryptocurrencies have entered the market. It is now largely a speculative asset rather than a widely-used currency.
Trust-building Insight: Litecoin’s consistent uptime and reliability have maintained trust, but its relevance in the ever-evolving crypto space is diminishing.

Internet Computer (ICP)

Expectation: Internet Computer was introduced with the goal of replacing centralized cloud services like AWS and Google Cloud.
Reality: The project has struggled to gain traction and is far from achieving its ambitious goals of decentralized internet infrastructure.
Trust-building Insight: Despite its technological advancements, ICP's complexity and lack of user adoption have hindered its progress.

Ethereum Classic (ETC)

Expectation: Ethereum Classic is the original chain that split from Ethereum after the DAO hack in 2016. It continues to use Proof-of-Work, contrasting with Ethereum's transition to Proof-of-Stake.
Reality: Ethereum Classic has failed to capture the same level of developer interest or community engagement as Ethereum.
Trust-building Insight: While some purists prefer Ethereum Classic’s adherence to blockchain immutability, its market relevance is minimal.

Stellar Lumen (XLM)

Expectation: Created by one of Ripple’s co-founders, Stellar aimed to facilitate cross-border payments, particularly in emerging markets.
Reality: Despite significant financial backing, Stellar’s adoption rate has been slow, and its use cases remain limited.
Trust-building Insight: Stellar's partnerships with institutions like IBM have built trust, but they have yet to translate into widespread adoption.

Stacks (STX)

Expectation: Stacks was designed to enable decentralized apps (dApps) and smart contracts on Bitcoin.
Reality: Despite its innovative approach, Stacks has yet to gain mainstream popularity, particularly in the DeFi space.
Trust-building Insight: Stacks has built a reputation for security and innovation but remains underutilized compared to other platforms.

Kaspa (KAS)

Expectation: Like Bitcoin, Kaspa is a proof-of-work chain but boasts faster block times and aims to improve upon Bitcoin's shortcomings.
Reality: Kaspa’s user base remains small, and it has struggled to differentiate itself in a crowded field of Bitcoin alternatives.
Trust-building Insight: Kaspa's technology holds potential, but adoption is crucial for its future success.

Theta (THETA)

Expectation: Theta was created to decentralize video streaming by offering a peer-to-peer network for bandwidth sharing.
Reality: Despite initial interest, Theta has not gained significant traction, and its user base remains small.
Trust-building Insight: Partnerships with major media companies like Sony have kept Theta in the spotlight, but user adoption lags behind expectations.

Fantom (FTM)

Expectation: Fantom is a high-performance blockchain designed to compete with Ethereum, particularly in the DeFi space.
Reality: Fantom has yet to distinguish itself meaningfully in the crowded DeFi market, with few standout applications or partnerships.
Trust-building Insight: Fantom's speed and scalability are impressive, but they have not translated into significant market share.

Monero (XMR)

Expectation: Monero offers privacy-focused transactions, positioning itself as a more secure alternative to Bitcoin.
Reality: While Monero has maintained a niche user base, its real-world applications remain limited, particularly due to regulatory scrutiny.
Trust-building Insight: Monero's commitment to privacy has earned it a loyal following, but its mainstream adoption faces significant hurdles.

Arweave (AR)

Expectation: Arweave aims to provide permanent, decentralized data storage.
Reality: Despite its innovative concept, Arweave has not seen widespread adoption, limiting its market impact.
Trust-building Insight: Arweave's unique offering of permanent storage has garnered attention, but practical use cases remain scarce.

Algorand (ALGO)

Expectation: Algorand was designed to compete with Ethereum, offering faster transactions and improved scalability.
Reality: Despite a strong technical foundation, Algorand is still developing its ecosystem and has yet to deliver on its full potential.
Trust-building Insight: Algorand’s focus on institutional adoption and partnerships has built trust, but it needs more traction in the broader crypto market.

Flow (FLOW)

Expectation: Flow gained attention during the NFT boom due to its low transaction fees and scalability.
Reality: After the NFT bubble burst, Flow’s activity has significantly decreased, and it struggles to maintain relevance.
Trust-building Insight: Despite its slow market performance, Flow's technology remains strong, and its partnerships with major brands offer potential for future growth.

MultiverseX (EGLD)

Expectation: MultiverseX was designed for metaverse gaming, aiming to support digital economies within virtual worlds.
Reality: Most of MultiverseX's usage has been for token trading rather than its intended gaming applications.
Trust-building Insight: The platform’s potential in the metaverse remains largely untapped, limiting its impact thus far.

Bitcoin SV (BSV)

Expectation: Bitcoin SV, backed by Craig Wright, was created as a hard fork of Bitcoin, with claims of being the "true" vision of Satoshi Nakamoto.
Reality: BSV has struggled with adoption, and its market presence is largely sustained by its loyal, but small, community.
Trust-building Insight: BSV’s connection to the controversial figure Craig Wright has hindered its broader acceptance.

Mina (MINA)

Expectation: Mina is marketed as the "smallest blockchain," offering high security and minimal resource requirements.
Reality: While innovative, Mina has yet to see significant adoption or practical applications.
Trust-building Insight: Mina’s technology is impressive, but without real-world use cases, it remains underutilized.

Tezos (XTZ)

Expectation: Tezos was once considered one of the most promising blockchain projects, emphasizing governance and upgradeability.
Reality: Despite strong funding, Tezos has struggled with user adoption, and its market impact has been minimal.
Trust-building Insight: Tezos’ focus on formal verification and governance has earned it a reputation for security, but it has yet to attract a significant user base.

EOS (EOS)

Expectation: Once hailed as the "Ethereum killer," EOS was designed to offer a more scalable and user-friendly blockchain platform.
Reality: EOS has failed to live up to its initial promise, and its developer activity and user engagement have both plummeted.
Trust-building Insight: Despite its early hype, EOS’s lack of real-world applications has severely hindered its growth.

Source: Forbes Digital Assets

‍